Yes No Share to Facebook
Selling Haunted Houses
Involves Concerns For Lawsuits Alleging Failure of Disclosure
Last Updated: July 02 2026
Question: Can Theresa Forrest, Paralegal help me as a seller in Ontario figure out whether I must disclose that my house is haunted before closing the sale?
Answer: Yes. Theresa Forrest, Paralegal can help Ontario sellers and buyers understand real estate disclosure duties and reduce legal risk by (1) identifying what counts as a material latent defect or safety issue that must be disclosed, (2) reviewing sales communications to avoid statements that could improperly stigmatize a property, and (3) drafting or advising on a full, accurate disclosure package in line with Canadian common law and Ontario court guidance on latent defects like McGrath v. MacLean et al, 1979 CanLII 1691. If you want a quick, practical review of your situation, call (519) 902-4223 to speak with a Paralegal serving clients across Ontario.
Is a Seller Legally Required to Tell a Buyer That a House Is Haunted?
A Lawsuit Regarding a Haunted House Maybe Unlikely; However, a Seller Can Avoid Legal Troubles By Providing Full Disclosure to a Buyer and Refraining From Statements That Risk Stigmatizing a Property.
Understanding the Law Regarding Disclosure Obligations When Selling a House Perceived As Haunted
In the case of 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association et al, 2013 ONSC 5401, a seller was subsequently sued by the buyer when the seller spread rumours that the house was haunted and that such was a detail the seller failed to previously disclose to the buyer. Subsequently, the buyer brought at a lawsuit and alleged that the haunted house rumour caused reduced realty value due to the stigma arising from such a rumour as well as for the failure of the seller to disclose the haunted status during the sales negotiations with the buyer.
The Law
On the issue of proper disclosure within realty transactions, the law in Canada appears clear that the seller has a duty to disclose to the buyer any latent defects in the property that may pose a danger or make the house uninhabitable. This rule was established by the Ontario Court of Appeal in the case of McGrath v. MacLean et al., 1979 CanLII 1691.
In regards to failing to disclose that a house is haunted, in the 1784773 Ontario Inc. case, it was determined that whereas the haunted house statements were made jokingly and whereas the buyer was unable to provide proof that the house was haunted, the case was dismissed. Accordingly, whether would find a seller liable if evidence of paranormal activity was available remains unknown. In another legal dispute regarding a haunted house, the case of Manitoba Free Press v. Nagy, [1907] S.C.R. 340, was reviewed by the Supreme Court of Canada following allegations of that a newspaper for published an article containing suggestions that a vacant house was haunted.
Summary Comment
The chances of getting sued for spreading a rumour that a house is haunted is slim, a former owner of a house should avoid spreading rumours that may adversely affect the value of the property. A seller limits the risk of legal trouble by providing proper disclosure during the selling process and thereafter keeping quiet.