Selling Haunted Houses Involves Concerns for Lawsuits Alleging Failure of Disclosure

Question: Does a Seller Need to Disclose if a House Is Haunted in Canada?

Answer: When selling a house, Canadian law requires the disclosure of any latent defects that could render the property uninhabitable, but does not explicitly address supernatural "defects" like hauntings. In the ruling of McGrath v. MacLean et al., 1979 CanLII 1691, the duty is on material defects. Although a humorous comment on a house being haunted was dismissed in 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association et al., 2013 ONSC 5401, it's wise to maintain open communication about property conditions to minimize potential legal disputes. For attentive assistance with real estate transactions, connect with a dedicated legal professional at Success.Legal.

Is the Seller of a House Required to Tell the Buyer That the House Is Haunted?

While It Is Unlikely That a Lawsuit About Whether a House Is Haunted Would Succeed In Court, It Is Always Best That a Seller Provides Full Disclosure to a Buyer and Then Refrain From Stating Anything That May Stigmatize a Property.

Understanding the Law Regarding Disclosure Obligations When Selling a House Perceived As Haunted

The case of 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association et al, 2013 ONSC 5401, suggests that a seller who jokes about selling a haunted house may be subsequently sued by the buyer for failure to disclose the haunted status.  The buyer, concerned that rumours of the haunted status may cause a stigma with resulting harm in the form of reduced property values and the claim sought compensation for failing to disclosure the haunted status during the sales negotiations.

The Law

On the issue of proper disclosure within realty transactions, the law in Canada appears clear that the seller has a duty to disclose to the buyer any latent defects in the property that may pose a danger or make the house uninhabitable.  This rule was established by the Ontario Court of Appeal in the case of McGrath v. MacLean et al., 1979 CanLII 1691.

In regards to failing to disclose that a house is haunted, in the 1784773 Ontario Inc. case, it was determined that whereas the haunted house statements were made jokingly and whereas the buyer was unable to provide proof that the house was haunted, the case was dismissed.  Accordingly, whether would find a seller liable if evidence of paranormal activity was available remains unknown.  In another legal dispute regarding a haunted house, the case of Manitoba Free Press v. Nagy, [1907] S.C.R. 340, was reviewed by the Supreme Court of Canada following allegations of that a newspaper for published an article containing suggestions that a vacant house was haunted.

Summary Comment

The chances of getting sued for spreading a rumour that a house is haunted is slim, a former owner of a house should avoid spreading rumours that may adversely affect the value of the property. A seller limits the risk of legal trouble by providing proper disclosure during the selling process and thereafter keeping quiet.